Realising women’s rights

“Each time a woman stands up for herself, without knowing it possibly, without claiming it, she stands up for all women.” ― Maya Angelou

Tomorrow, 8 March, the World will observe International Women’s Day. The theme this year is, I am Generation Equality: Realizing Women’s Rights. As the UN states: “The emerging global consensus is that despite some progress, real change has been agonizingly slow for the majority of women and girls in the world. Today, not a single country can claim to have achieved gender equality. Multiple obstacles remain unchanged in law and in culture. 

“Women and girls continue to be undervalued; they work more and earn less and have fewer choices; and experience multiple forms of violence at home and in public spaces…legal restrictions have kept 2.7 billion women from accessing the same choice of jobs as men. Less than 25 per cent of parliamentarians were women, as of 2019. One in three women experience gender-based violence…International Women’s Day is a time to reflect on progress made, to call for change and to celebrate acts of courage and determination by ordinary women, who have played an extraordinary role in the history of their countries and communities.”

Yes, we want change. They say that women hold up half the world. Just look at the large number of female-headed households in TT. How many of them go to work each day worrying that there are no appropriate day care services for the children they have left behind to be cared for by neighbours, friends or relatives? 

Incest, domestic violence, human trafficking, sex-ploitation, sexism, racism, economic inequality, lack of access to education and other social ills continue to keep many women and girls from realising their potential. 

While our Government has responsibility for putting legislation, policies, frameworks in place to promote gender equality, the private sector and civil society – each of us, must bring to bear our voices and our “hands” to efforts to effect change. Pope Francis’ advice is sound: “Offer your…energies and your talents to building a civilisation of Christian love…commit yourself to the struggle for justice, solidarity, and peace.”

Let us pray for courage to stand up for what is right. Justice can never be achieved if each of us cocoons ourself in comfortable surroundings and ignore the plight of those who face the brunt of injustice. As Malala Yousafzai said: “I raise up my voice-not so I can shout but so that those without a voice can be heard…we cannot succeed when half of us are held back.” 

Any male jok­er can make a child, but it takes a fa­ther to raise one. So, the fact that many women have raised chil­dren with­out fa­thers to be self-suf­fi­cient and car­ing cit­i­zens doesn’t un­der­mine the virtues and crit­i­cal im­por­tance of fa­thers’ lov­ing care and con­trol in the holis­tic de­vel­op­ment of chil­dren. There’s abun­dant ev­i­dence to show that fe­male-head­ed house­holds are with­in the low­er so­cio-eco­nom­ic groups and are vul­ner­a­ble to pover­ty and oth­er so­ci­etal ills. 

UNICEF had done a Sit­u­a­tion Analy­sis in col­lab­o­ra­tion with the Gov­ern­ment in 2017, which men­tioned that “women are over-rep­re­sent­ed in low­er-in­come brack­ets” and that much pover­ty is “con­cen­trat­ed in house­holds head­ed by women.” That re­port cit­ed a larg­er than av­er­age house­hold size of five for the most de­prived com­pared to two in the wealth­i­est group. The na­tion­al av­er­age was four chil­dren per house­hold. 

Among poor com­mu­ni­ties, there is psy­cho­log­i­cal de­pri­va­tion, as well as il­lit­er­a­cy, sub­stan­dard liv­ing con­di­tions, high ex­po­sure to ad­dic­tion, crime and vi­o­lence, poor par­ent­ing—lack of care and con­trol of chil­dren, and school dropouts. The analy­sis in­di­cat­ed that apart from emo­tion­al rea­sons, some sin­gle moth­ers en­ter re­la­tion­ships for fi­nan­cial sup­port. When the re­la­tion­ships end, there may be a “re­volv­ing door,” ex­pos­ing the chil­dren to dan­gers. The re­port al­lud­ed to the in­ter­gen­er­a­tional na­ture of pover­ty, and that teenage moth­ers were like­ly to have been the chil­dren of teenagers.

Teenage preg­nan­cies were re­port­ed at 3,777 be­tween 2014 and 2018 (JSC Par­lia­ment 17/4/19). More than like­ly, that fig­ure had been un­der­es­ti­mat­ed if it hadn’t in­clud­ed pri­vate in­sti­tu­tion births.

Based on the 2011 cen­sus, of the ap­prox­i­mate­ly 401,382 house­holds in T&T, the ge­o­graph­ic dis­tri­b­u­tion of fe­male-head house­holds was wide-rang­ing from 45 per cent in Port of Spain, Juan/Laven­tille 40 per cent, San Fer­nan­do 38 per cent, Diego Mar­tin 37 per cent, Tu­na­puna/Pi­ar­co 36 per cent to San­gre Grande 31 per cent, Ch­agua­nas 31 per cent, Siparia 30 per cent, Couva/Talparo/Tabaquite 26 per cent, and Pe­nal/Debe 24 per cent etc. An up­dat­ed cen­sus isn’t like­ly to show much change in those sta­tis­tics.

In an­oth­er re­port, the Chil­dren’s Au­thor­i­ty men­tioned that crime and delin­quen­cy might start with chil­dren in pri­ma­ry school (nine–11 years) more so boys. No­tably, the most delin­quent acts of chil­dren “take place with­in the school,” main­ly fight­ing, but there is a “high preva­lence of sex­u­al vic­tim­iza­tion.”

We see the im­ages every day of most­ly youth of African de­scent charged for mur­ders and oth­er vi­o­lent crimes. These are alarm­ing truths, and there’s an in­creas­ing trend. Al­though, the num­ber of them is still very small, un­der one per cent of their pop­u­la­tion. Crit­i­cal in­ter­ven­tions are need­ed. There is the out­rage about ed­u­ca­tion in­equity and calls to do away with the Con­cor­dat, which is the agree­ment be­tween the Gov­ern­ment and the de­nom­i­na­tion­al schools that al­lows the Gov­ern­ment to fill 80 per cent of the places in these schools based on Sec­ondary School As­sess­ment (SEA) grades. There’s a con­stant fo­cus on the 20 per cent, not 80 per cent. But the Con­cor­dat gave most chil­dren, whose par­ents wouldn’t have been able to af­ford high school fees, the op­por­tu­ni­ty to at­tend the best per­form­ing schools. If they re­vert­ed to pri­vate fee-based sta­tus, there would be a dire short­age of places for thou­sands of chil­dren. That isn’t to say there may not be is­sues in the se­lec­tion of the 80 per cent.

His­tor­i­cal­ly, most of the stu­dents who had achieved high­er grades had at­tend­ed sin­gle-sex de­nom­i­na­tion­al schools. In the girls’ schools, the teach­ers are most­ly fe­male; in some, 100 per cent. In the boys’ there is a bal­ance of male and fe­male teach­ers. Stu­dent vi­o­lence and dis­rup­tions are min­i­mal and man­age­able. Drop-out rates are next to ze­ro. These schools strict­ly en­force poli­cies, and par­ents and stu­dents have no op­tion but to ad­here to the rules. There’s ex­cel­lent stu­dent en­gage­ment through teacher/stu­dent bond­ing, prop­er main­te­nance of the phys­i­cal en­vi­ron­ment, re­in­force­ment of tra­di­tion­al val­ues of dis­ci­pline, car­ing, re­spect­ful­ness, and ex­cel­lence among staff and stu­dents. School boards are com­mit­ted, and par­ents sup­port the schools.

The Gov­ern­ment and the Min­istry of Ed­u­ca­tion are aware of the com­plex is­sues of crime, ed­u­ca­tion, and so­cial in­equity. They have the re­search re­ports, and MOE’s had iden­ti­fied its fail­ings in the Draft Ed­u­ca­tion Pol­i­cy. 

The an­swer to in­equity in ed­u­ca­tion rests with the MOE’s abil­i­ty to en­sure sound man­age­ment of gov­ern­ment schools and to make them all de­sired choic­es for chil­dren. Strate­gic in­ter­ven­tions to shut down the en­gine rooms of crime, and to trans­form the ed­u­ca­tion sys­tem, en­sur­ing that no child’s learn­ing needs are ne­glect­ed are need­ed, now. That would re­quire leg­isla­tive changes to the ed­u­ca­tion sys­tem that’s caught in a colo­nial time warp.

First Published in the Trinidad and Tobago Guardian Newspapers

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest
Picture of ttcsocialjustice

ttcsocialjustice

Leave a comment